Pages

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Know your Legal Lingo Part 3 – Case Law and Expert Opinions

When is a strainer a container? When it’s a leaking landfill that conformed to the “state of the art” at the time of construction. How can that be? Well, that's the case law – for now – in the Western District of Michigan.

Case law?  How does that relate to experts?


It is important for you, the expert, to know the case law or precedent governing certain issues on which you are providing expert opinions. The jurisdiction of your case – whether in state or federal court - dictates the case law the judge will abide by when making his/her rulings. Knowing to ask your attorney about the applicable case law not only demonstrates your knowledge of the legal system, but more importantly having the information ensures you are sufficiently aware of what the court will be considering on various issues when you are forming your opinions, preparing your expert report and testifying in deposition and at trial.

Here we explain the basics of the U.S. court system and provide an example of how case law was used to resolve a question of law concerning a pollution exclusion provision in an insurance coverage matter involving groundwater remediation.

Case Law


The U.S. justice system relies on “stare decisis”, Latin for “to stand by things decided,” which means, courts adhere to or abide by prior court decisions on cases containing similar issues and questions of law. The collection of cases in which prior court rulings were made is referred to as “case law,” a term that attorneys use regularly when considering which cases to cite in arguing their position before the court. The term “precedent” or rule of law is the actual decision or case law that a court relies on or considers when deciding a current case with similar issues.  Both judges and lawyers conduct legal research to determine the relevant precedents established in their jurisdiction and how they apply to the present case.  The jurisdiction in which a case is pending is extremely important because it dictates the applicable and controlling case law.

As shown in the figure below, at the state level, jurisdiction refers to the groupings of trial courts that are bound by decisions made by the higher controlling regional appellate court.  All regional appellate courts are bound by the decisions made by the highest court in the state, usually called the “Supreme Court.” When precedent has not been established from the highest court, then a ruling by the appellate court becomes binding upon the lower courts in the same jurisdiction until such time as the supreme court of that state hears the case and reaffirms, modifies or overturns, or rules in another case on similar facts, thus setting precedent for the state.


At the federal level, there are 94 District Courts that fall under the jurisdiction of  the U.S. Court of Appeals with one located in each of 13 separate circuits (Circuit Courts). These appellate circuit courts are bound by decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The appellate courts in different circuits are not bound to each other, though in a number of cases one circuit  court may be guided by decisions made in another circuit court and make similar rulings, as we previously blogged about in a recent Daubert post. Diversity jurisdiction occurs when a lawsuit is removed from state court to federal court, but the law of the state in which the case was originally filed would be applied by the federal court.    


The leaking landfill: an example of expert opinion in the context of case law


Recently, in Decker Manufacturing Corporation v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Michigan (a federal court “sitting in diversity,” applying Michigan state law) held that policyholders do not lose insurance coverage under the pollution exclusion provision just by putting their hazardous waste in landfills that are meant to contain the waste materials.  A great summary of the case can be found on Orrick’s Policyholder Insider blog. In short, the Court held that the release of waste from the landfill as opposed to the intentional placement of waste into the landfill was the “relevant discharge” to consider in terms of what Decker (the policyholder) “expected or intended” when it used the landfill. The Court found that the landfill was equivalent to a “container” such that Decker would have expected it to behave like a container – i.e. the placement of materials inside it would not be nor result in a “discharge.”

Why did the court rule this way? Case law.

In his opinion, Judge Robert Holmes Bell provided a thorough analysis of the applicable Michigan case law pertaining to the landfill issue in the case. In brief, he found there wasn’t a precedent set by the Michigan Supreme Court on the “precise issue of relevant discharge for purposes of applying pollution exclusion in the context of a landfill”; therefore he was bound to Michigan Court of Appeals decisions if they were relevant. He ultimately cited two cases involving pollution exclusion in the context of landfills as the basis for his decision.  Judge Bell stated, “[t]he landfills at issue in Kent County and South Macomb are virtually identical to the Landfill at issue in this case.” He was referring to Michigan appellate court decisions from prior cases: South Macomb, 225 Mich.App. 635, 572 N.W.2d 686; Kent County, 217 Mich.App. 250, 551 N.W.2d 424. In these cases, the court had ruled the landfills at issue were analogous to a container as long as the landfills were “state of the art,” meaning built in conformance with the contemporaneous standards.  

The Court in Decker agreed with defendant Traveler’s expert that the landfill was not designed or constructed to prevent the escape of pollutants to the soil or groundwater. Where the Court disagreed, was in determining the applicable standard for the landfill. Traveler’s expert opined the landfill did not conform to “state of knowledge” (emphasis added) because it did not meet standards defined by the engineering and scientific communities at that time. The Court disagreed - stating the applicable standard was “state of the art” (emphasis added): what was known at the time by the designers, inspectors and licensors. Applying this standard and citing City of Albion, 73 F.Supp.2d 846, South Macomb and Kent County, the court ruled the landfill did conform to the applicable standard in Michigan - it was equivalent to a container despite the fact that it had leaked contaminants into the environment.

This case is a perfect example of how case law is used by courts to resolve questions of law and how expert testimony is considered in the context of the case law and precedent.

Other jurisdictions on leaking landfills


Other state supreme courts have weighed in on the issue of what constitutes “relevant discharge” under an insurance policy’s pollution exclusion provision – the placement of wastes into a landfill or the subsequent escape of wastes from a landfill. Similar to Decker is the Supreme Court of California’s decision in State of California v. Allstate Ins. Co. (45 Cal. 4th 1008, 201 P.3d 1147, 90 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1), concerning the infamous StringfellowAcid Pits in which policyholders also did not lose insurance coverage just by putting their hazardous wastes in sites that are meant to contain them.  In contrast, the Supreme Court of Montana held that the policyholder’s intentional disposal of hazardous wastes into a landfill represented the relevant discharge and not the subsequent migration of hazardous wastes from the landfill into the groundwater (Travelers Casualty and Surety Company V. Ribi Immunochem Research Inc), 108 P.3d 469 (Mont. 2005)).

The bottom line: Know your jurisdiction and the context of the relevant case law as it applies to your opinions.



52 comments:

  1. The law firm is reckoned by innumerable immigrants for its relentless and useful services in the spheres of immigration law.
    patricknathan.tumblr.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. More number of individuals look for exhortation of a movement offense legal advisor in Gold Coast to determine their instances of petty criminal offense.Estate Planning Brandon FL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Overall clear and prompt communication involving complex as well as straightforward issues.
    Will recommend to Offer In Compromise Lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  4. Personal lawyers that specialize in personal injuries such as car accidents, medical practice, defective products, assault, slip and falls, etc, have the experience and knowledge to effectively represent their clients. Types of lawyers,

    ReplyDelete
  5. Among the various law offices that render exhortation and suggestion on worldwide honest to goodness issues, Manchanda Law is acclaimed for its mammoth experience and affectability in overseeing different sorts of cases. driving under the influence

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow what a Great Information about World Day its very nice informative post. thanks for the post.legal

    ReplyDelete
  7. Excellent information on your blog, thank you for taking the time to share with us. weebly Amazing insight you have on this, it's nice to find a website that details so much information about different artists.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I’m impressed with your views on this matter and I agree with a lot of your ideas. york medical malpractice

    ReplyDelete
  9. The said fixed annual fee is excluding Litigation, arbitration, drafting of contracts and appearance before authorities and tribunals. The above said fixed fee is not uniform for all, it is finalized after estimation of work and the size of the Company.Contabilitate Iasi

    ReplyDelete
  10. law firm need to much consider legitimate outsourcing? Are there legitimate reasons why focused lawful outsourcing ought to be considered by each U.S. law firm? trademark registration

    ReplyDelete
  11. A significant responsibility of an auto accident lawyer is to guide the victim about his legal rights related to filing the lawsuit and apart from the medical costs recovery, he also protects your rights. Detroit Auto Accident Lawyers

    ReplyDelete
  12. The information you have posted is very useful. The sites you have referred was good. Thanks for sharing this:
    http://www.taabura.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for taking the time to discuss that, I feel strongly about this and so really like getting to know more on this kind of field. Do you mind updating your blog post with additional insight? It should be really useful for all of us. Detroit

    ReplyDelete
  15. Some doctors will sue a patient if he or she leaves an online review that reflects poorly on his or her services or practice or when a patient product warning

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is great! Supervised driving with parents may provide teens with opportunities to increase learning, reinforce proper driving techniques and skills, and get constructive comments from the men and women who care about their safety and success.
      

    best DUI law firms in Orlando

    ReplyDelete
  17. Soni Law Firm is a trusted civil litigation firm of a specialist civil lawyer in Toronto, focused on employment law, labour law, and personal injury law. The firm’s principal lawyer named Rahul provides the best legal consultancy services to meet the diverse legal needs of your business and employment.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I am always searching online for articles that can help me. There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also. Keep working, great job! Visit https://www.mosscolella.com/michigan-motorcycle-accident-lawyers/ for a lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  19. Certainly with your thoughts here and that i love your blog! I’ve bookmarked it making sure that I can come back & read more in the foreseeable future. https://www.gpwlaw-mi.com/

    ReplyDelete
  20. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. Elia & Ponto

    ReplyDelete
  21. definately enjoy every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff of your blog a must read blog! Website

    ReplyDelete
  22. Most administrations will need to get some information about your case, so don't be timid about letting them know. You're likely in a rush, however when addressing a lawyer, there are key things you have to cover.GPW Law

    ReplyDelete
  23. The 2018 Country Music Association has announced that the 52nd annual CMA Awards Live Stream. Country Music Association it's called CMA. annual music awards program on network broadcast here.

    ReplyDelete
  24. They’re also cast as heels, allegedly crafted due to the McMahon family’s belief that the far right cost Linda the election. A tag feud between these two seems a natural fit, with Darren Young cast as the good guy. onsist.com

    ReplyDelete
  25. Thankyou for sharing the data which is beneficial for me and others likewise to see. onsist.com

    ReplyDelete
  26. On the off chance that your lawyer isn't endeavoring to get your judgment paid; you can most likely discover another lawyer, recuperation master, or organization, to attempt to recoup your judgment.נהיגה בשכרות עונש

    ReplyDelete
  27. I really loved this article! It gave me some new insights I never really thought about before. IRIS Tax Attorney

    ReplyDelete
  28. Laws and codes seek to establish clearly defined rights and duties for certain individuals. business litigation lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  29. From an individual angle, choosing a lawyer is dependably an individual issue. Be that as it may, likewise with any specialist co-ops, the lawyer is simply giving his/her support of his/her customer.עורך דין תביעה ייצוגית

    ReplyDelete
  30. It’s amazing in support of me to truly have a web site that is valuable meant for my knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Brett helped me to win total custody of the kids. Any issue i needed he was there to resolve and clarify the procedure. He was honest and opens regarding the total method. drunk driving lawyers

    ReplyDelete
  32. Legal fees will be under extreme scrutiny. Legal outsourcing, while still a nascent industry, is gaining momentum, being considered in more corporate boardrooms.Brian Holm Attorney San Diego

    ReplyDelete
  33. For instance, separate from lawyers will require money related records, land deeds, car titles, current and earlier years' assessment forms, and data encompassing minor kids.
    pittsburgh car accident lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  34. Regardless of whether the criminals are solid individuals or would they say they are rationally sick as regularly suspected by the humanized world?nowland law

    ReplyDelete
  35. The person who suffers such an injury at the hands of a car accident should quickly consult a brain injury lawyer to file a compensation case. lawyers specializing in medical malpractice

    ReplyDelete
  36. Obviously, you can set up a business all alone, yet despite everything you need a lawyer. No one but lawyers can give you lawful exhortation. They are approved and equipped for doing as such.
    do i need a personal injury lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  37. I need to welcome the creator. I wanted to peruse that. Much obliged to you such a great amount for imparting the post to all. You are bookmarked.
    resolution law firm

    ReplyDelete
  38. Good composed article. It will be steady to any individual who uses it, including me. Continue doing what you are doing – can'r hold up to peruse more posts. Bail Bondsman

    ReplyDelete
  39. Great job for publishing such a nice article. Your article isn’t only useful but it is additionally really informative. Thank you because you have been willing to share information about case law. conveyancing law firms Melbourne

    ReplyDelete
  40. The main thing a law school will judge in your application is the way you challenged yourself. Learning from any course can be applicable to your law education. https://dr-goz-peter-ugyved.business.site/

    ReplyDelete
  41. Prior to the appearance of the Brussels/Lugano framework and the Modified Regulation the conventional principles were applied in all cases, and it is their recorded roots that make it suitable to allude to them as the customary English law/rules. la personal injury

    ReplyDelete
  42. an unwed father is entitled to a hearing to determine his fitness as a parent before the state can obtain custody of his children following the mother's death. child support calculator

    ReplyDelete
  43. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or tips. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more things about it! Los mejoresabogados de familia viña del mar

    ReplyDelete
  44. Great job for publishing such a nice article. Your article isn’t only useful but it is additionally really informative. Thank you because you have been willing to share information about case law. Thanks for giving me like this information.
    serialkeygens

    ReplyDelete
  45. Civil law is considered codified. Each civil law country has their own codes to determine the different punishments for each of the categories of law. https://www.bestdivorcelawyerdelhi.in/

    ReplyDelete
  46. Great job for publishing such a nice article about case law. worth visiting your blog visit here Real Estate services Greensburg

    ReplyDelete
  47. Using the right words is very important! Thanks for the post corporate lawyer Toronto

    ReplyDelete